COPY RIGHTS : TO AVOID COPYRIGHT VIOLATIONS, ALL POSTS ARE SHOWN ALONG WITH SOURCES FROM WHERE ITS TAKEN. PLEASE CONTACT ME IN MY EMAIL ALIMAMANULLAH@GMAIL.COM , IF YOU ARE THE AUTHOR AND YOUR NAME IS NOT DISPLAYED IN THE ARTICLE.THE UNINTENTIONAL LAPSE ON MY PART WILL BE IMMEDIATELY CORRECTED.

TIPS:Your BLOG is the main thing.The next thing is how to market your blog through various means like facebook, linkedin and email. Write SEO optimized articles in your blog.



Thursday, 3 November 2016

Typhoid and Malaria Co-Infection – An Interesting Finding in the Investigation of a Tropical Fever

Introduction

Case Report

A 41-year-old Malay man, working as a logger, presented with two weeks of fever, myalgia and abdominal pain. He had been diagnosed and treated for malaria 20 years ago. He remained asymptomatic until now. He had no other history of traveling to other malaria endemic country and not taking any malarial chemoprophylaxis. On examination, he was febrile with temperatures swinging between 37°C and 39.3°C and relative bradycardia. He was not jaundiced and neither were any rashes noted. There was no hepatosplenomegaly.
His full blood count showed normal Hb (14.2 g/dl) and platelet count (201 × 109/l). The white cell count, however was within normal range (5.2 × 109/l) with neutrophil predominance. Serum albumin was 34.9 g/l, alkaline phosphatase 178 IU/l, aspartate transaminase 63 IU/l, alanine transaminase 63.9 IU/l and total bilirubin 9.4 umol/l.
Ultrasonography of the abdomen showed hepatomegaly with a mildly echogenic parenchyma. The spleen was at the upper limit of normal (13.8 cm). Blood cultures isolated Salmonella typhi. The first Widal test was not significant (T(O) 1:50 and T(H) 1:50). The second Widal test taken nine days later showed T(O) 1:100 and T(H) 1:200. Serial blood smears for malaria parasites was positive for Plasmodium vivax (160/ul blood) on the fifth smear.
He was treated with chloramphenicol 500mg qid for 14 days and a course of chloroquine and primaquine with uneventful recovery.

Discussion

Typhomalaria was first described by an army doctor, J J Woodward (1833–1884) in 1862 among young soldiers during the American Civil War who were suffering from febrile illness that seemed to be typhoid (including intestinal lesions found at postmortem) but with fever patterns also suggestive of intermittent fever. He believed that it might be a hybrid rather than a new species of disease ( – ). However, by the end of 19th century, laboratory tests had eliminated this theory as they found that it was either one thing or the other, or in rare instances, co-infection with both S. typhi and the plasmodium of malaria.
Both typhoid and malaria share social circumstances which are imperative to their transmission. Therefore, a person living in such an environment is at risk of contracting both these diseases, either concurrently or an acute infection superimposed on a chronic one. A high index of suspicion is necessary to diagnose a co-infection as most clinicians are used to linking every symptom and sign to a single pathology.
In co-infections, the diagnosis of typhoid should be made from a culture specimen as false positives and overestimation occur with the use of the Widal test. Ammah et al reported that in 200 patients with fever, 17% had concurrent malaria and typhoid fever based on bacteriological proven diagnosis as compared to 47.9% based on the Widal test (). This is to be expected as the Widal test being a serological test, only proves exposure to a certain antigen. It does not tell if an infection is recent or not. Samal et al, described 52 patients with malaria positive in the peripheral blood smear (cases consisted of vivax, falciparum or mixed vivax and falciparum), out of whom eight cases had a positive Widal test but blood cultures were negative for S. typhi in all. All of the cases were cured with antimalarial therapy (). There were no complications attributed to these infections documented in the previous reported cases. Nevertheless, complications may occur even if the patients received adequate treatment. Hence, monitoring for the complications is essential especially for travelers traveling to endemic areas.
The actual and precise underlying mechanisms to explain the association between malaria and Salmonella species infection is still uncertain. However, there are few postulations which may explain why malaria may predispose to salmonella bacteremia and sepsis. It has been shown that antibody response to O antigen of S. typhi was markedly reduced in acute episode of malaria compared with that in controls where humoral immunity is transiently impaired (). It has been demonstrated in a murine model of infection with Salmonella murium that hemolysis which occur in malaria may predispose to gram-negative organism as what has been seen in hemolytic disease caused by sickle cell disease and bartonellosis https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3347907/#b7-mjms-13-1-074
In the case illustrated above, the diagnosis was from a blood smear and a blood culture, both providing objective evidence of the on-going dual infection. Fortunately, he did not developed any complications such as hemolysis.
Although cases which had been reported were common among travelers, certain areas in our country is still considered endemic for both malaria and typhoid infections and our patient demonstrated that although he is not a traveler, these co-infection may still occur. Thus, in malarial patient with persistent fever in spite of therapy, one should consider drug resistant as well as concomitant gramnegative infection such as typhoid fever.